News
August 2, 2008
Landfill-power plans questioned
City Council will be asked to give methane plant developer a no-bid lease

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- The president of the City Council and the operator of a similar project in Pennsylvania say the city should seek competitive proposals, but council members will be asked Monday to approve a no-bid lease for a methane power plant at the city landfill.

Entrepreneur Tom Loehr announced plans July 21 to build a 3-megawatt power plant to be fueled by methane, a greenhouse gas created by decomposing trash that is now vented into the atmosphere. A former state treasurer, Loehr said he has formed a company, Charleston Clean Energy LLC, that will raise $3 million of private money for the project.

University of Charleston President Ed Welch has said he's interested in buying the plant's electricity as a way of creating a "green campus" and as an educational tool.

According to City Manager David Molgaard, the lease for the project is being prepared this week. "The legal departments are working on it. The city would be compensated 12.5 percent on the sale of methane, which is standard compensation for a gas lease."

The lease is listed on the agendas for the meetings of the City Council and its Finance Committee on Monday.

That surprised Tom Lane, longtime council president. "I don't want to be presented with a fait accompli," he said Wednesday, before the agendas for Monday had been distributed.

"I hadn't thought about the hoops we have to go through," Lane said, "but I'm thinking we have to get proposals, and Tom [Loehr] is going to be ahead of the curve."

Lane said Thursday he has asked for a legal opinion on the procedures the city must follow to execute such a lease, and is seeking independent analysis of the terms of the lease.

City Council members first learned about the project when Mayor Danny Jones introduced Loehr at the start of the July 21 council meeting. There was no mention of Loehr's visit or the project on the meeting's agenda.

Jones and Loehr have discussed the project for several months. Jones hailed it as a no-risk green venture for the city.

"It all sounds good," said Jim Warner, executive director of the Lancaster County Solid Waste Management Authority in central Pennsylvania. In partnership with PPL Corp., an energy company, he helped develop a similar 3.2 MW landfill power project that's been in operation since early 2006.

However, Warner raised some questions about Charleston's plans, wondering what experience Loehr has in developing a landfill-methane power project: "Typically, you want to go to a company that has done a project before.

"The city obviously has no experience in running a landfill project. To protect their interests, I think they should hire a consulting firm and do a request for proposals," Warner said. The consultant can negotiate the best deal for the city and get references to check their past experience, he said.

"Who in the city is qualified to say whether that 12.5 percent [royalty] is a good figure or not? Who is going to be negotiating the electricity sales agreement?" Warner said. "There are other things of value in this besides the methane."

Selling carbon credits

In particular, there are lucrative carbon-offset credits that can be sold on the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX), assuming that the Charleston landfill meets the exchange's requirements. Warner told his peers about credit trading last October during the annual convention of the Solid Waste Association of North America.

"We're selling carbon credits, which ended up being worth 10 times the value of the gas," he said, although he later said it was more like eight times. In the first year of trading, Warner sold about $234,000 worth of credits on the CCX.

Carbon-offset credits are based on the idea that, by burning methane to produce electricity, you reduce the amount of greenhouse gas that otherwise would be polluting the atmosphere. Companies that are required to cut their own emissions can purchase credits as an alternative.

The CCX awards 18.25 credits for each ton of landfill methane removed from the atmosphere. The value of credits changes daily, but has been hovering lately around $4 per credit - $3.95 on Thursday. At that rate, one ton of methane would be worth $72.09 in credits.

Charleston's landfill, which produces an estimated 4,000 tons of methane a year, might generate carbon-offset credits worth nearly $290,000 a year.

Advertiser
Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: oldbroad (9:23am 08-04-2008)
Report Abuse


There would be enough fuel for everyone if they tapped into the gas in Washington.

Posted By: Sally (2:04pm 08-03-2008)
Report Abuse


My grandbaby works as a janitor over at UC. How can they care about a green campus when the heating and cooling in Riggleman Hall dates to the 1940s. All the glass windows are single pane. They don't even have a recycling program.

Posted By: J (11:44pm 08-02-2008)
Report Abuse


The trade of carbon credits is fine - it just needs to be in place as a mandatory system. Enron didn't invent the idea - they were only one of the first to trade lots of them.

Over time the cap and trade system will make it more profitable for companies to reduce emissions than to keep on polluting, and this is exactly what needs to be done.

Posted By: Carbon Credits From Enron (6:52pm 08-02-2008)
Report Abuse


Carbon Credits are what's driving projects like these. They are unregulated and were invented by Enron. The worst part about them is they allow polluters to keep on polluting. Enron is gone but it's legacy of dirty dealing lives on with the carbon credit. At least the developer admits that's what he's after instead of trying to hide behind a green curtain.

It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The Charleston Gazette.

Click here to order home delivery.

Advertiser
Advertiser