Prep Sports
April 26, 2008
Dissatisfaction with four-class plan isn't unanimous

IT DIDN'T take long for the reaction to start pouring in after the SSAC Board of Control earlier this month approved a proposal to go to four classes for high school football and basketball.

Almost universally (at least in print media), the notion was blasted. Comments ranged from "almost comical'' to "a potential plague.''

Doug Huff, secretary/treasurer of the West Virginia Sports Writers Association, even suggested there could be a reduction in all-state honors - perhaps going to Big School (4-A/3-A) and Small School (2-A/1-A) teams, because the WVSWA couldn't justify four all-star teams for so few schools statewide.

Certainly, the issue presents an easy target for detractors, especially when you consider neighboring states like Ohio and Pennsylvania - with hundreds more schools than West Virginia - have only four classes for basketball. And Kentucky crowns just one champion.

However, that doesn't mean the proposal doesn't have supporters. After all, 78 of 115 voters at the Board of Control meeting endorsed it to the state Board of Education, which will have the final call on the matter later this summer.

Many coaches around the state feel very passionately about the subject. Mark Hatcher, Logan's boys basketball coach, argues that the four-class proposal would do a world of good for the state.

"The coaches I've talked to,'' Hatcher said, "say there's nothing in our state that compares to playing in Charleston in basketball. To go on that Civic Center floor just one time and get your name called out is a very, very big deal for basketball players in our state.

"It would be better for exposure reasons, too. If you're really good, [colleges are] going to come and find you. Or if you're playing AAU ball, they'll see you. But a lot of kids who might play in Division II or III or NAIA, playing in the state tournament is where they get seen. The more teams that get there, the better their chances would be.''

Hatcher doesn't think the extra seven games required for holding an additional state championship bracket would tax the facilities or fans' patience.

"I think they could work it so you wouldn't have to play at 7 o'clock in the morning,'' he said. "It would take one extra day - you'd start on Tuesday - and one extra game Saturday. I don't think anybody would miss any more school.

"The only problem is that you'd have to hold some of the semifinals on Thursday night. Actually, that would look pretty neat to have some of those single-A and double-A teams playing final-four games at night.''

Hatcher thinks those prime-time small-school semifinals could prove a windfall for the SSAC, since double-A teams like Logan, Wyoming East and Ravenswood already bring large crowds for morning games at the state tournament.

In 2003, the state track meet added an extra class (when AA and A schools were broken into their own divisions), and the move went almost seamlessly. The only variations to the schedule were starting an hour earlier and ending about 20 minutes later on Friday, and starting an hour earlier and ending about 90 minutes later Saturday.

Advertiser
Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.

It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The Charleston Gazette.

Click here to order home delivery.

Advertiser
Advertiser