Breaking News
August 19, 2008
Kanawha bars hold protest against smoking ban
Advertisement - Your ad here

Nobody's going to tell Kerry "Paco" Ellison's customers they can't smoke at his bar.

The Black Hawk Saloon is Ellison's bar, and he'll run it as he sees fit.

"If I don't want to pray, I don't go to church," Ellison said. "If you don't want to smoke, don't come in here."

Today, Ellison and at least a dozen other bar owners across the county defiantly encouraged their patrons to smoke in violation of the Kanawha-Charleston Health Department's six-week-old smoking ban.

Ellison said he's sick and tired of playing by the rules while his competitors secretly allow their customers to light up. He's called the Health Department to complain, but nothing is done, he said.

"Either rescind the order or enforce it," Ellison said. "Either make it happen or let it go. I want a level playing field."

Two Health Department sanitarians inspected Ellison's bar and outside patio -- where smoking is allowed -- a half-hour before it opened this afternoon. No warnings or fines were issued, Ellison said.

"They were very cut and dry, to the point," Ellison recalled. "I said, 'Is that it?' 'For now,' they said."

The Health Department regulations prohibit smoking in bars, gambling parlors and the Tri-State Racetrack & Gaming Center.

Other Kanawha County bars that took part in today's protest included The Empty Glass; The Pour House Sports Bar; Julie J's; Number 8; The Pump; Sham's; Lucky Laverty's; McNalley's Pub; Smiley's; Dave's Tavern; and The Dream Tank.

Health board President Brenda Isaac called the bar owners a "rebel group."

"This is a very small percentage of bars in the county," Isaac said. "It's too bad they're getting all this publicity. Most of the bar owners are very law-abiding."

Isaac said the Health Department would issue a warning to bars that violate the smoking ban. Bars that continue to thumb their noses at the regulations will face sanctions -- a $200 to $1,000 fine in Magistrate Court, if found guilty.

Isaac said the department is investigating all complaints, with the vast majority being filed by bar owners who allege their competitors are ignoring the smoking ban. The Health Department has seven sanitarians who inspect bars and restaurants for food and smoking violations.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: FXR (9:34am 08-29-2008)
Report Abuse


How do we understand a society so determined to place oppressive restrictions on itself. Perhaps a second look at your sources of information driving your perspectives might help shed a little light on the situation. When you look at all the information and opinions available, it all boils down to one simple truth.

The Public Health movement represents a joining of theology with politics, promoted with highbrow propaganda. Because you can not legitimately describe "disease management" as Science, Research or Medicine. Although the protagonists will assure us they represent them all.

False and misleading advertising applies, in the use of the funds and resources of medical charities and Government expenditures, provided for something which can never describe the prescriptions of hatred and divisions provided, by demeaning judgments in place of medical treatments.

If there is a legitimate use of the term “pandemic” in describing a non contagious disease it has to be in reference to the Public Health

Posted By: History Buff (12:24am 08-21-2008)
Report Abuse


No smoke = No go = I'll keep my own dough!

Posted By: B. Brown (12:10am 08-21-2008)
Report Abuse


If you’re a small independent hospitality business and property owner, then you're likely in agreement that Smoking bans are an obvious violation of private property rights. Property rights are under assault as only these property owners could know and understand that they are. Smoking Bans are not about the health of Non-smokers, and they are most assuredly not in the best interest of independent business when the prescribed protection is based on coercion through punitive measures enforced against the independent business owner for having the audacity to provide an environment that is specifically sought by patrons, and known as one that will accommodate their personal preferences. Promoters of the new moral code of health repeatedly demonstrate their utter disdain for personal liberty and private property rights. Smoking Ban proponents clearly believe that Non-Smokers are not intelligent enough to understand "Smoking Permitted" signage, property rights and liberty be damned!

Posted By: Paul (7:25am 08-21-2008)
Report Abuse


Just to set a few of you straight. A federal court case in the early 70's set the record straight regarding buildings. A building is considered private, regardless of what is inside. Just because the public is invited in does not make it a public place.

It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The Charleston Gazette.

Click here to order home delivery.

Advertisement - Your ad here