November 7, 2009
Kevin Alexander Gray: We need to prevent future Greensboro massacres
AP Photo
Police restrain suspects after the 1979 shootings in Greensboro, N.C.
Advertiser

This week marks the 30th anniversary of the Greensboro Massacre. We need to recall it so something like it never happens again.

On the morning of Nov. 3, 1979, at the corner of Carver and Everitt streets in Greensboro, N.C., 40 Ku Klux Klansmen and American Nazis took out shotguns and automatic weapons from the trunks of their cars and opened fire on black, white and Latino anti-Klan demonstrators and union organizers who had gathered at Morningside Homes, a black housing project.

The KKK and Nazi members shot at anyone who wasn't hiding while four television news teams and one police officer recorded the action. The murderers then got back into their cars and sped away, leaving five people dead and 11 wounded.

All five were members of the Workers Viewpoint Organization, and four of them were rank-and-file union leaders and organizers.

Let us remember the victims.

  • Sandi Smith was a nurse who'd been active in the black student movement and was trying to unionize textile workers. A black woman, she was shot between the eyes.
  • Dr. James "Jim'' Waller was vice president of the AFL- CIO local textile workers union. He led a strike in 1978 that helped the union grow from about 25 members to almost 200. He also had co-founded the Carolina Brown Lung Association.
  • Bill Sampson was a graduate student of the Harvard University School of Divinity.
  • Cesar Cauce was a Cuban immigrant who graduated from Duke University.
  • And Dr. Michael Nathan was chief of pediatrics at Lincoln Community Health Center in Durham, N.C., a clinic that helped children from low-income families.
  • When radicals began entering the mills, organizing cross-racially, and were elected to union positions, the power structure felt threatened.

    Report a violation or offensive comment.
    [X] Close
    to report abuse.
    Posted By: smarbap (5:00pm 11-11-2009)
    Report Abuse


    Actually, the protesters were members of the Communist Workers Party. The purpose of assembly was to march through the government housing projects of the Morningside Homes community in an effort to recruit new members. To further incite violence, those of the Communist Workers Party were screaming chants of "Death to the Klan!"

    In present-day America, in which a Marxist is now President, in which "political correctness" and "diversity" excuse subversive public displays, and in which those residing in government housing projects are deemed "the less fortunate", this is all no big deal. But this happened in late 1979, a time in which the Carter administration brought us double-digit inflation, double-digit unemployment, a nonsensical "energy crisis", and an overall national mood best characterized as suicidal. The Cold War was still raging; the Soviets were soon to invade Afghanistan. Advocating communism while declaring "Death to the Klan!" was, at best, extremely reckless.

    Posted By: Red Dragon 70 (10:42am 11-11-2009)
    Report Abuse


    Your questionsare fair, so I will fairly deal with them, as best as I understand them. It is clear that the march location was in a community most heavily populated by African Americans who were employed at the various textile mills in Greensboro community. The location of themarch and the presence of the marchers there could not be interpreted as provactive in any way. There are times when assembly is intended to affirm the solidarity of those participating, and not necessarily to change the mind of anyone outside the group. I can only conclude that those assembled were intending to stay "peaceful" because showed up with no weapons, whereas the Klansmen came riding into this community not only brandishing, but ultimately firing their weapons, resulting in the deaths (murders.) The aquitting jury took the position that because some of the assembly were professed "communists," the holding of such beliefs was provacative enough, regardless of limited actions.

    Posted By: smarbap (9:16am 11-11-2009)
    Report Abuse


    Believe that this is definitely NOT the proper approach:
    http://tinyurl.com/uphomey

    Posted By: smarbap (9:40am 11-10-2009)
    Report Abuse


    While they may have had a permit to demonstrate, was it prudent to assemble in an area in which violence was likely to occur? More important, did their demonstration actually alter any opposing viewpoints? While murder is undoubtedly wrong, there is a degree of responsibility required of the demonstrators to avoid actions that could put individual lives and private property in harm's way.

    Furthermore, what remains unknown from the content of this story are the events preceding the shootings. Were the demonstrators truly intent on remaining peaceful, or did they verbally spar with the opposition to the extent that emotional and impulsive action resulted?

    Advertisement - Your ad here
    Advertisement - Your ad here
    PRECISION TUNE
    Precision Tune Auto Care is the fast, convenient and affordable solution to all of your car repai...
    Advertisement - Your ad here