Op-Ed Commentaries
June 15, 2008
J. Davitt McAteer
Enough: No more mining deaths

It is time to stop killing our children, husbands, brothers and sons in the name of mining. The death on May 30th of Adam Lanham, age 18, of Mill Creek, is so revolting that it should shock the mining industry and the community at large.

How, after 150-plus years of mining deaths, do we still ask men and women in this country to put their lives at risk as part of their daily job?

How do we explain that an underground haulage accident snuffed out this young life? Deaths in mines today are merely replicas of deadly incidents which have occurred before, multiple times and in multiple other mines. The same hazards, the same causes lead to these deaths. We have not invented new ways to kill our miners.

Why do highly profitable mining corporations engage in business practices known to increase the risks and dangers these men face? The use of contractor employees by ICG (International Coal Group) in this instance, and by many other mining companies as well, is a practice known to increase miners' risk of injury and death because of ineffective training and supervision. Red hat or entry-level miners, such as Mr. Lanham, are at particular risk. ICG was not his employer. ICG hired Mine Temp LLC, of Morgantown, as a contractor who hired and "trained" Adam to work at the Sentinel Mine. His total mining experience was four weeks and five days; his risk of harm was higher because he was a contract miner.

But deaths in the name of mining didn't stop with young Mr. Lanham. On June 5, Gary A. Hoffman, 55, at Rivesville in Marion County, at the Robinson Run Mine owned and operated by Consol Energy, and on Tuesday, June 3, two other miners were killed in separate accidents in Indiana and Kentucky.

But where is the response and where is the corporate resolve from the mining industry to put an end to the senseless pattern? Many industry spokesmen complained bitterly after Sago, Aracoma, Kentucky Darby and Crandall Canyon that government at both the state and federal levels was adopting laws which were too onerous for the mining industry.

To his credit, last August, J. Brett Harvey, President of Pittsburgh-based Consol, called on the coal industry to end death in the mines by ending the corporate acceptance of and tolerance to fatal accidents.

Tragically Mr. Hoffman's death at a Consol mine only highlights the need to increase the resolve Mr. Harvey called for.

Advertiser
Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close

0 / 150
Posted By: IndependentThinker (12:33am 06-16-2008)
Report Abuse


Back when mules were used extensively in the mines they'd shut the mine down and solve the problem far quicker if a mule was killed but not a man. If a mule was killed due to unsafe conditions, it affected production far worse.

It rally hasn't changed all that much since that time, has it?

Posted By: dsmess (9:16am 06-16-2008)
Report Abuse


First off,I'm not a miner.I worked 28 years as a steelworker,then had a stroke.
That said, ANY accident in the mill prompted investigation and corrective action.A death meant CHANGES IN EVERY CASE. Training, equipment,and practices were examined and usually changed.
NO ONE, from management to new hire, accepted it!!
I know mining is dangerous, but to see it as an acceptable risk is wrong. Try to fix every hazard as it appears,and mining will be LESS RISKY as time goes by.

It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The Charleston Gazette.

Click here to order home delivery.

Advertiser
Advertiser