November 1, 2009
Silly protest: Partisan sniping
Advertiser

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- The head of the state's Democratic Party, lawyer Nick Casey of Charleston, has been recommended by U.S. Sens. Robert C. Byrd and Jay Rockefeller to be a federal judge. If President Obama accepts their recommendation (and there's no reason to think he won't) and the Senate goes along (an almost certainty), Casey soon will be hearing federal cases in the Eastern Panhandle.

Some Republicans, including Eastern Panhandle delegates Craig Blair and Jonathan Miller, would have you believe this is an outrage, because of Casey's politics and geography. They say he shouldn't be nominated because he lives outside the Panhandle.

If they truly believe this argument, then it's surprising they didn't protest three years ago, when a similar situation unfolded.

In 2000, Thomas E. Johnston was the Republican chairman in Ohio County, in the Northern Panhandle, and was a coordinator for the Bush-Cheney campaign.

Once Bush was in the White House, Johnston was named U.S. attorney for West Virginia's Northern District. Whatever Johnston's qualifications, it would be foolish to suggest politics didn't play a role in his selection.

(Witness the disastrous nomination of Kasey Warner, brother of the state GOP chairman at the time, for the U.S. Attorney job in Charleston.)

Five years later, Johnston was tapped by Bush and U.S. Rep. Shelley Capito to be a federal judge in the state's Southern District, based in Beckley.

We don't remember Republicans being upset about Johnston's partisan political past when he was recommended as a federal judge. We don't remember them saying anything about the incongruity of a lawyer based in Wheeling taking a seat on the bench in Beckley (the cities are about the same distance apart as Charleston and Martinsburg).

Johnston was confirmed as a federal judge by the U.S. Senate on an 89-0 vote. Casey deserves no less.    

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: One Citizen (5:21pm 11-05-2009)
Report Abuse


Talk about your "activist judge"

The rightwing group West Virginians For Life Inc. ("WVFL") filed a 51-page complaint asking U.S. District Judge Thomas E. Johnston to declare then-new WV election laws unconstitutional. The filing asked Johnston to grant an injunction preventing election officials from enforcing the new laws, which went into effect Oct. 1, 2008, requiring groups like WVFL to either reveal who financed the group in a timely manner, or else lose its political advocacy status

It just "so happens" that coal baron Don Blankenship financed WVFL's court battle, after having maxxed out the amount he could legally contribute to the group. Despite state laws to the contrary, rightwing judge Johnston ruled that it's okay for the group to distribute lies about Blankenship's opponents after Repub Secretary of State Ireland rolled over in court and let Blankenship's lawyers have their way
http://tinyurl.com/yaf3pyt

One can but hope that Casey will aright the scales.

Posted By: EB (9:25am 11-02-2009)
Report Abuse


Good reporting by the Gazette; when it first noted the Casey story, I posted that it was wrong for a political operative of ANY political party to be nominated to the bench, and I meant it. Shame on the Republicans to oppose Casey as a partisan hack if they're doing the same thing.

Posted By: NPanhandle (7:17am 11-02-2009)
Report Abuse


Though the spirit of this editorial is very well-expressed, there are some liberals who are not thrilled about Casey's nomination - most notably because of his past as a lobbyist for the US Chamber of Commerce and others.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
MC CORMICK JEWELERS
A name you have know and trusted for over 60 years for honesty, quality and fair prices. The own...
Advertisement - Your ad here