GOP strategist Karl Rove once foresaw a "permanent Republican majority" in America. The party's burgeoning base encompassed the affluent elite - plus white fundamentalists mobilized by "God, guns and gays" - plus Dixie whites swayed by President Nixon's "Southern strategy" of subtle appeals to racism - and the like.
GOP strategist Karl Rove once foresaw a "permanent Republican majority" in America. The party's burgeoning base encompassed the affluent elite - plus white fundamentalists mobilized by "God, guns and gays" - plus Dixie whites swayed by President Nixon's "Southern strategy" of subtle appeals to racism - and the like.
But last week's election jerked the rug from under that Rovian vision. Since Barack Obama's stunning victory, analysts scanning exit polls say a distinct tide is pulling America in the Democratic direction. (Astronomers find a "red shift" in light from receding stars, but a "blue shift" is happening in the U.S. electorate.)
White evangelicals still voted three-to-one Republican on Nov. 4 - and Alabama whites voted almost 90 percent "red" - but they were overwhelmed by an upsurge of diversity in the populace. Young voters, Hispanic voters, well-educated voters, urban voters, black voters, tolerant voters, etc., produced the Democratic floodtide.
"It's just straight-out demographics," political pundit Jon Margulis wrote. "...The people who voted for John McCain Tuesday were richer, whiter (meaning non-Hispanic whiter), more rural, more religious, and less educated. Oh, and older."
As aging voters die off, he concluded:
"For Republicans, the news only gets worse. Not only is the country becoming less white Anglo, it's becoming less rural and perhaps even less religious. ... Every year, the country gets more diverse, more metropolitan, more cosmopolitan, even a bit more secular. In the process, it gets less Republican."
The Christian Science Monitor said America is gaining a surge of under-30 voters who are "more ethnically diverse, secular, technologically adept, and Democratic."
Washington Post columnist Harold Meyerson wrote Wednesday: "The election has left the Republican Party reeling, its base shrunk to those southern, plains and mountain west states where rural cultures still predominate. ... Republicans have grown weaker everywhere but the white rural south - the region that remains the least-educated and least-diverse."
Columnist Frank Rich wrote that the McCain campaign failed in its attempt to "turn Americans against one another in the name of 'patriotism.'" He said vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin bungled "her fierce embrace of the old Karl Rove wedge politics, the divisive pitting of the 'real America' against the secular 'other' America." Rich concluded:
"The post-Bush-Rove Republican Party is in the minority because it has driven away women, the young, suburbanites, black Americans, Latino-Americans, Asian-Americans, educated Americans, gay Americans and, increasingly, working-class Americans. Who's left? The only states where the GOP increased its percentage of the presidential vote were West Virginia, Tennessee, Louisiana and Arkansas."
A Tuesday New York Times analysis said glaring racism among Southern whites is visible in the election results. "Southern counties that voted more heavily Republican this year than in 2004 tended to be poorer, less-educated, and whiter," it said. The national paper quoted University of Maryland political scientist Thomas Schaller as saying Republicans "have become a Southernized party. They have completely marginalized themselves into a mostly regional party."
Earlier this year, a new book titled The Strange Death of Republican America: Chronicles of a Collapsing Party contended that "the Republican Party has retreated into the Deep South and Rocky Mountains." It declared that President George W. Bush "has remade the Republican Party, turning it into a minority party as a consequence of his radicalism," meaning his favors to the rich and fundamentalists, his plunge into avoidable war, his deregulation of greedy Wall Street, and the like.
In Friday's Washington Post, GOP figure Christine Todd Whitman, co-chairman of the Republican Leadership Council, said her party has been "taken hostage by social fundamentalists, the people who base their votes on such social issues as abortion, gay rights and stem cell research." As a result, she said, moderate, mainstream Americans voted Democratic, having "rejected the politics of demonization and division."
Various other factors such as the economic crisis and the unpopular Iraq war - plus the brilliant, trust-inspiring eloquence of Democratic nominee Barack Obama - spurred last week's GOP defeat. Beyond those considerations, is rising diversity shifting the U.S. populace as a whole toward the Democratic Party? We hope so - but nobody can be sure until future election returns are counted.
GOP strategist Karl Rove once foresaw a "permanent Republican majority" in America. The party's burgeoning base encompassed the affluent elite - plus white fundamentalists mobilized by "God, guns and gays" - plus Dixie whites swayed by President Nixon's "Southern strategy" of subtle appeals to racism - and the like.
But last week's election jerked the rug from under that Rovian vision. Since Barack Obama's stunning victory, analysts scanning exit polls say a distinct tide is pulling America in the Democratic direction. (Astronomers find a "red shift" in light from receding stars, but a "blue shift" is happening in the U.S. electorate.)
White evangelicals still voted three-to-one Republican on Nov. 4 - and Alabama whites voted almost 90 percent "red" - but they were overwhelmed by an upsurge of diversity in the populace. Young voters, Hispanic voters, well-educated voters, urban voters, black voters, tolerant voters, etc., produced the Democratic floodtide.
"It's just straight-out demographics," political pundit Jon Margulis wrote. "...The people who voted for John McCain Tuesday were richer, whiter (meaning non-Hispanic whiter), more rural, more religious, and less educated. Oh, and older."
As aging voters die off, he concluded:
"For Republicans, the news only gets worse. Not only is the country becoming less white Anglo, it's becoming less rural and perhaps even less religious. ... Every year, the country gets more diverse, more metropolitan, more cosmopolitan, even a bit more secular. In the process, it gets less Republican."
The Christian Science Monitor said America is gaining a surge of under-30 voters who are "more ethnically diverse, secular, technologically adept, and Democratic."
Washington Post columnist Harold Meyerson wrote Wednesday: "The election has left the Republican Party reeling, its base shrunk to those southern, plains and mountain west states where rural cultures still predominate. ... Republicans have grown weaker everywhere but the white rural south - the region that remains the least-educated and least-diverse."
Columnist Frank Rich wrote that the McCain campaign failed in its attempt to "turn Americans against one another in the name of 'patriotism.'" He said vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin bungled "her fierce embrace of the old Karl Rove wedge politics, the divisive pitting of the 'real America' against the secular 'other' America." Rich concluded:
"The post-Bush-Rove Republican Party is in the minority because it has driven away women, the young, suburbanites, black Americans, Latino-Americans, Asian-Americans, educated Americans, gay Americans and, increasingly, working-class Americans. Who's left? The only states where the GOP increased its percentage of the presidential vote were West Virginia, Tennessee, Louisiana and Arkansas."
A Tuesday New York Times analysis said glaring racism among Southern whites is visible in the election results. "Southern counties that voted more heavily Republican this year than in 2004 tended to be poorer, less-educated, and whiter," it said. The national paper quoted University of Maryland political scientist Thomas Schaller as saying Republicans "have become a Southernized party. They have completely marginalized themselves into a mostly regional party."
Earlier this year, a new book titled The Strange Death of Republican America: Chronicles of a Collapsing Party contended that "the Republican Party has retreated into the Deep South and Rocky Mountains." It declared that President George W. Bush "has remade the Republican Party, turning it into a minority party as a consequence of his radicalism," meaning his favors to the rich and fundamentalists, his plunge into avoidable war, his deregulation of greedy Wall Street, and the like.
In Friday's Washington Post, GOP figure Christine Todd Whitman, co-chairman of the Republican Leadership Council, said her party has been "taken hostage by social fundamentalists, the people who base their votes on such social issues as abortion, gay rights and stem cell research." As a result, she said, moderate, mainstream Americans voted Democratic, having "rejected the politics of demonization and division."
Various other factors such as the economic crisis and the unpopular Iraq war - plus the brilliant, trust-inspiring eloquence of Democratic nominee Barack Obama - spurred last week's GOP defeat. Beyond those considerations, is rising diversity shifting the U.S. populace as a whole toward the Democratic Party? We hope so - but nobody can be sure until future election returns are counted.
Post a comment
Interesting comments! Have no earthly idea where "protest activity" comes into play in this whole discussion, but, to each his own :)
curious,
Interesting you use the phrase "dog eat dog." Suggest you read the classic Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand, which addresses the whole notion of "dog eat dog" far better than I can in this limited space. With respect to "HELPEACHOTHER," to do so voluntarily is wonderful especially given that the holiday season is upon us. But to use government as an instrument of plunder, some sort of official conduit through which government mandates contributions and then redistributes that which is plundered in the name of "fairness" or "helping one another" is a most frightening scenario.
You're back !
Thought you were pouting.
A protest march ?
I'm so there.
I had been holding my breath waiting for a job as State 'Soft and Small and Delicate Parts' inspector -- Yeah, with a badge and a gun ! -- but it just ain't gonna pan out anytime soon. I don't look good blue. Those small, soft, delicate parts still need to be completely inspected and duly recorded, but I'm confident that The State/Church Genital Control Freaks will make another stab at this very important matter.
So, keep me apprised. State jobs, marches, protests, boycotts, dissent, civil disobedience, sit-ins, walkouts...
skepdoc, anarchoatheist Enemy of The State and The Church....and you should be as well.
You've convinced me of the evils of the government schools. Tell me what time the protest activity will begin as we march on those malevolent elementary educations institutions in Kanawha County that twist the minds of the young. Let's have a concerted effort to expose the propagandizing that happens at Riverside, South charleston, and certainly St. Albans High School. Tell me which should come first, do we attack Marshall, or move on Morgantown, to rid society of those bastions of government disinformation and indoctrination.
If we can exterminate the societal system of these malignant bulwarks of political and economic distortion, we can then go back to rendering education only to those who deserve it, those whose parents have exploited WV's middle and working classes. Why should we care about the rest? As far as you and I are concerned, let them eat "coal!"
Long live the oligarchy!