June 25, 2009
Mountaintop removal damage 'irreversible,' U.S. Senate hears
DEP official only witness to defend practice
Advertiser

Read more in Coal Tattoo.

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- Mountaintop removal coal mining is causing "immense and irreversible" damage to Appalachian hills, streams and forests, members of a U.S. Senate subcommittee were told Thursday.

A federal regulator joined a university expert, a West Virginia activist and a Tennessee environmental commissioner in criticizing large-scale strip mining's impacts, as lawmakers consider a bipartisan bill that would curb the practice.

"We must consider the cost of coal from the cradle to the grave," said Maria Gunnoe, a Boone County native who won the international Goldman Prize for her anti-mining activism. "We have the opportunity to stop the annihilation of mountains and people by mountaintop removal and to change the history of energy in this country."

Margaret Palmer, a University of Maryland ecologist who has been studying mountaintop removal's impacts, explained that scientists have clearly documented the damage being done.

"The mountain summits that are removed to reach the coal may not have the same shape or height they previously did, the streams that are buried when rocks and dirt are dumped over the side of the mountain into the valleys below are gone forever, and there is no evidence to date that mitigation actions can compensate for the lost natural resources and ecological functions of the headwater streams that are buried," Palmer told lawmakers.

Palmer and Gunnoe were among those who testified in a Senate Environmental and Public Works subcommittee hearing scheduled to examine mountaintop removal, the Obama administration's plans for regulating it, and legislation that would outlaw most -- if not all -- valley fills.

The only witness who defended mountaintop removal was Randy Huffman, who as secretary of the state Department of Environmental Protection is the Manchin administration's top strip-mining regulator.

Huffman said his agency has an "effective and progressive" regulatory program, and that his main concern is that Obama administration efforts to more closely regulate the practice "have the potential to significantly limit all types of mining."

"West Virginia and the nation need jobs and coal," Huffman told senators. "Coal production is the leading revenue generator for West Virginia, and many in the state are concerned about losing the opportunities for future economic development associated with mountaintop mining."

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: ericaut (11:34am 07-02-2009)
Report Abuse


I posted researched information and rwc says "i doubt that". One Citizen posted info about credible research on the costs of coal mining and conservative says "i doubt that". 4god addressed rwc's concern about roads and malls(as i did) yet rwc continues to bring this up as if it's a new, significant point. Seeing as how rwc and conservative have bird-dogged this forum and that they have never acknowleged the social and environmental disaster created by mtr mining makes me think they are paid to do just this. Their main contributions are to doubt what others say and claim no one has any alternatives...strip malls and roads ruin the land therefore mtr mining is ok too. Saying "i doubt that" and asking endless questions are common tactics to stop discussion when people don't like the facts. There are plenty of examples and research showing how clean environment translates into a good quality of life and ruined environment leads to short term bucks and long term ruination and poverty.

Posted By: ericaut (10:20am 07-02-2009)
Report Abuse


I posted researched information and rwc says "i doubt that". One Citizen posted info about credible research on the costs of coal mining and conservative says "i doubt that". 4god addressed rwc's concern about roads and malls(as i did) yet rwc continues to bring this up as if it's a new, significant point. Seeing as how rwc and conservative have bird-dogged this forum and that they have never acknowleged the social and environmental disaster created by mtr mining makes me think they are paid to do just this. Their main contributions are to doubt what others say and claim no one has any alternatives...strip malls and roads ruin the land therefore mtr mining is ok too. Saying "i doubt that" and asking endless questions are common tactics to stop discussion when people don't like the facts. There are plenty of examples and research showing how clean environment translates into a good quality of life and ruined environment leads to short term bucks and long term ruination and poverty.

Posted By: ericaut (9:45am 07-02-2009)
Report Abuse


I posted researched information and rwc says "i doubt that". One Citizen posted info about credible research on the costs of coal mining and conservative says "i doubt that". 4god addressed

Posted By: rwc (1:23pm 07-01-2009)
Report Abuse


how many people actually make a decent living off of tourism? you say political leaders are making profits off coal? i don't know where you got your stats for that comment but you need to check again.then ask yourself this, what is the difference between flattening out hills in wv for roads , airports ,housing developement,and etc compared to mtr? big business gets richer off everyone, not just coal companies.aparently you haven't been paying to much attention with your one tracked mind but the turnpike just got their raise and who is it owned by? right there is a prime example of mtr on a permenate basis.most mtr sites have to put the dirt and rock in close proximatey to the way it was. how many construction companies that destroy other sites are made to do so? you may have a onesided arguement, but think about how many times do you travel the turnpike or other roads to get where you're going and how many of those took off mountain tops?how many shopping centers took of mountain tops?

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here