October 22, 2009
Williams' supporters don't believe her latest story
"I don't think much of what Megan Williams is allegedly saying. I think she is being manipulated," said Malik Shabazz, head of the group Black Lawyers for Justice.
Advertisement - Your ad here

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- The woman Megan Williams now lives with and the man who rallied to her side shortly after she was found are both skeptical of her most recent claim that she wasn't abused in Logan County in 2007.

"I don't think much of what Megan Williams is allegedly saying. I think she is being manipulated," said Malik Shabazz, head of the group Black Lawyers for Justice. "Her not showing up at the news conference is telling.

"And based on my knowledge of what's been happening with her over the last year and a half, this seems like a scheme by her caretaker to garner sensationalism and publicity in an attempt to get some money," Shabazz said.

Valencia Daniels, whom Megan is living with in Columbus, Ohio, says Williams said Thursday the abuse did take place.

At a press conference on Wednesday, lawyer Byron L. Potts said Williams was recanting her claims about the abuse. He said Williams told him that the only injuries that weren't self-inflicted were the bruises on her face.

Authorities don't believe Williams' new claims. They point to the physical evidence and the fact that all seven defendants pleaded guilty and confessed their roles in the incident.

State Police found Williams on Sept. 8, 2007, at a trailer where Frankie Brewster and her son Bobby lived. Besides the Brewsters, five other people were charged in the case. Six of the seven are now in prison.

Potts said he plans to see that Williams has a mental evaluation; otherwise, he won't remain involved in the case. "The way she reacted to what's going on, I have some concerns about her competence," he said.

Daniels agrees that Williams needs a mental evaluation. She said Williams cut her hair off a week ago, in an attempt to look as she looked shortly after she was found in Logan County.

"She said, 'I'm going to get the same hotel room in New York I got the last time,'" Daniels said. "That's what she wanted, to get attention.

"I believe something happened to Megan but that she exaggerated the story."

During the investigation, Shabazz was critical of the plea deals, criticizing then-Logan County Prosecutor Brian Abraham for not pushing harder.

He said he now agrees with Abraham's decisions. "I agree with him that the convictions were correct and what happened in 2007 was real," he said.

Shabazz said there was never any indication that Williams' story was a hoax or a fraud.

"I also knew that perhaps Megan Williams didn't make the strongest witness, so I understand why there were plea deals even though I still believe they should have been stronger," he said.

Shabazz said he didn't coerce Williams into saying anything. He said he dealt with her primarily though Carmen and Matthew Williams, her adoptive parents. Carmen Williams died in June of this year.

"I only heard [Megan's] story three times through a couple of interviews," he said. "I came into this case with her already having told her story."

Posted By: lhvine (4:23pm 10-24-2009)
Report Abuse


This appears to me to be manipulation of a mentally challenged woman whose original testimony resulted in guilty pleas of the perpertators in this case. She may recant all she wants to but when one of the actors states "I pled guilty. I did it." or words to that effect then her change of story is a moot point. Megan needs to be someplace or in some home where she will be cared for and not manipulated by others. We can't get rid of her as Atworkreader suggests but we can control who and where she is cared for.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
Categories
Subscribe
It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The Charleston Gazette. Click here to order home delivery.