May 20, 2009
W.Va. State faculty wants MIC gone from Bayer
Advertiser

http://wvgazette.com/news/bayerexplosion " target="_blank">Read more about Bayer

CHARLESTON, W.Va. - Faculty at West Virginia State University have voted to urge Bayer CropScience to remove the stockpile of deadly methyl isocyanate from the company's Institute plant.

The plant, adjacent to State's campus, stores more than 200,000 pounds of MIC, the chemical that killed thousands of people in a 1984 leak at a Union Carbide plant in Bhopal, India.

In recent weeks, the Bayer facility has come under renewed scrutiny, after federal investigators reported the August 2008 explosion that killed two plant workers could easily have damaged or destroyed one of the MIC tanks.

Last week, West Virginia State's faculty unanimously approved a resolution on the MIC issue similar to one approved about a week earlier by the university's faculty senate.

The resolution stated, "The faculty at West Virginia State University demands that the storage of MIC and or other deadly toxins at Bayer's Institute plant be eliminated or drastically reduced to a minimum.

"Kanawha Valley residents are the only people in the United States still living or working next to a chemical plant that maintains large amounts of MIC in storage -- twenty five years after MIC claimed so many thousands of people's lives during the Bhopal disaster," the resolution said. "The recent and ongoing investigation by the U.S. Chemical Safety Board into the deadly accident at the Bayer-Institute plant on August 28, 2008, has revealed that Bayer has not, and likely cannot, responsibly manage the storage of these types of chemicals.

"The time has come for Bayer to eliminate these storage hazards as they continue to threaten the lives of all Kanawha Valley residents, rather than continue to force us to wait for another deadly incident and the loss of all hope that Bayer can ever effectively manage large-scale MIC storage."

Congressional investigators and safety board officials have said that serious safety lapses by Bayer caused the August 2008 explosion, which occurred about 80 feet from a tank that can hold up to 37,000 pounds of MIC.

For years, the local group People Concerned About MIC has advocated that the Institute plant get rid of its MIC stockpile. In recent weeks, political leaders including Kanawha County Commissioner Kent Carper and Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., have joined in demanding an independent review of the issue by the safety board.

Bayer maintains that its MIC storage and handling is safe, but told a congressional hearing it sought to use chemical plant anti-terrorism secrecy rules to avoid a public discussion of the issue.

Tom Dover, an Institute plant spokesman, could not immediately be reached for comment Wednesday.

@tag:Reach Ken Ward Jr. at kw...@wvgazette.com or 304-348-1702.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: funfundvierzig (10:28pm 05-23-2009)
Report Abuse


Folks, amazing how these zealous Bayer fans desperate to softpedal the enormous real and potential danger of storing and processing massive quantities of highly toxic chemicals in the backyards of the families in this Valley so disdainly dismiss the considered judgement of the Congressional investigators when they concluded the exploding tank "CAME DANGEROUSLY CLOSE TO COMPROMISING" or blasting open the tank containing several tonnes of methyl isocyanate, mere feet away!

If that doesn't scream terrifying DANGER, I don't know what does! Do you?

...funfundvierzig..

Posted By: Apollo (8:19pm 05-23-2009)
Report Abuse


Once again my point has been proven in an attempt at rebuttal.

The phrase "Had the projectile [the 'residue heater'] struck the MIC tank" is pure speculation. It is a "what if" statement. The sentence means the same were it to say "If the projectile...". One synonym for speculate is "theorize" and that is all the Congressional investigators can do. What computer models, simulations, testing, etc. did the Congressional investigators run to support their statements. If you're gonna make a statement regarding this incident, back it up with scientifically verifiable data - on all sides.

Now I shall sit back and wait for the ad hominem "shill" replies.

Posted By: funfundvierzig (3:40pm 05-23-2009)
Report Abuse


The CSB is not speculating idly or remotely. The Congressional Report by the Investigations Subcommittee to Members, Committee on Energy and Commerce, concluded April 21, 2009,

"...the explosion [at Bayer's Institute plant] came dangerously close to compromising another nearby tank filled with several tons of methyl isocyanate (MIC)...

Had the projectile [the 'residue heater'] struck the MIC tank, the consequences could have eclipsed the 1984 disaster in India."

...funfundvierzig..

Posted By: Apollo (1:46pm 05-23-2009)
Report Abuse


mountainmomma,

First, the final report has not been issued and secondly there is no statement in any of the reports that the MIC tank was in danger of "exploding". The CSB interim report stated that some shrapnel was found at the base of the blast mat surrounding the MIC Day Tank and the CSB has speculated about "what if" the exploded vessel had traveled in a different direction and struck the tank.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
JEFF'S APPLIANCES
Offering sales and service on brands like Whirlpool, Maytag, Speed Queen, GE, JennAir, KitchenAid...
Advertisement - Your ad here
Inside wvgazette.com