November 7, 2009
John King legal battle spills over to bankruptcy court
Advertiser

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- John King, the osteopathic surgeon who generated 124 lawsuits while he was a staff physician at Putnam General Hospital from December 2002 to June 2003, is still fighting legal battles in Birmingham, Ala., where he filed for bankruptcy on Nov. 21, 2007.

A new legal battle centers on a "legal malpractice" suit King filed on that same day against Richard Glynn Poff Jr., a Birmingham lawyer.

King hired Poff to file lawsuits alleging "legal malpractice" by some of his previous lawyers, including three Charleston law firms: Steptoe & Johnson, Giatris & Webb and McQueen & Murphy. The suit seeks unspecified monetary damages.

"Poff failed to prosecute the cases and claims in which he has undertaken to represent [King]," wrote Keith W. Veigas Jr., a Birmingham lawyer who filed the suit in Jefferson County Circuit Court in Birmingham.

On December 23, 2008, a trustee for the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Alabama held an auction in Birmingham to sell the potential value of the suit against Poff.

Lois Tanner, King's sister, was the highest bidder. She paid $32,500 for the rights to claims made in the lawsuit against Poff.

After the auction, the Jefferson County Circuit Court, where the case against Poff is pending, ruled the claim against Poff was "personal" and could not be auctioned off.

Mark B. Ellis, another Birmingham lawyer who represents King, wants the bankruptcy court to throw out the Jefferson County Circuit Court order.

The county court, Ellis writes, ruled "the claim [against Poff] is personal in matter, between attorney and client, and cannot be prosecuted by a third party purchaser or transferee."

 Ellis wants the Alabama bankruptcy court to "set aside" the auction and give $32,500 back to Tanner.

In an order issued on Oct. 9, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Thomas B. Bennett refused Ellis's request.

The auction held by the bankruptcy court trustee, Bennett wrote, did "not include any warranty and that there is no basis to set aside the sale. ... The debtor's [King's] motion to set aside auction and hold [the sale] for naught in denied."

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here