June 23, 2009
Subpoenas served in Workforce West Virginia probe
Advertiser

CHARLESTON, W.Va. --  The U.S. Attorney's Office has subpoenaed former and current employees of a Cross Lanes marketing firm to testify next month before a federal grand jury investigating a state employment programs official and her son, convicted felon Martin Bowling, the Gazette has learned.

An FBI agent and state investigators hand-delivered the subpoenas earlier this week.

Past and present employees of Comar Inc. and its subsidiary, Vec3, are scheduled to testify before the grand jury on July 22 at the Robert C. Byrd U.S. District Courthouse in Charleston.

Comar CEO Albert Hendershot confirmed Tuesday that three employees received subpoenas. Two of the workers -- Rusty Felty and Kevin Mullins -- recently left the firm and returned to college.

A fourth former Comar employee also received a subpoena Monday.

"We've told everyone to fully cooperate and be as candid as possible," said Hendershot, whose firm also publishes MetroValley magazine. "We want to be open. We understand [federal prosecutors] are doing their due diligence."

Federal and state authorities are looking into whether Mary Jane Bowling, a state Workforce West Virginia office manager, improperly steered federal grant money that was ultimately used by Martin Bowling, former chief technical officer at Comar and Vec3.

The grant money also was used to pay consulting fees to Martin Bowling's fiancée, Mandi Felty, and Mary Jane Bowling's housemate, Christine Gardner, who runs West Virginia State University's Economic Development Center.

In April, Martin Bowling and Mandi Felty were assigned public defenders in federal court after filing financial affidavits, an action that usually means the defendants are targets or subjects of a grand jury investigation.

FBI agent James Lafferty and state Legislature Commission on Special Investigations agents Carl Hammons and Steven Staton are leading the Bowling investigation.

On May 7, they searched Gardner's house in Cross Lanes. Mary Jane Bowling lists the same address, records show. It's unclear whether the investigators seized any items from the house. Workforce West Virginia also is reviewing how the grant money was spent. The agency is expected to release a report next month.

"It all looks good," said Hendershot, who has reviewed a preliminary draft of the report and maintains the grant money was spent appropriately. "It was all fair and reasonable. I'll be happy when you get it."

A federal prosecutor declined to comment on the grand jury investigation Tuesday.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: traveler4 (6:25pm 06-25-2009)
Report Abuse


OMG!!! Work force? hush hush. Shh! anyone subpoenaed is being quiet. most probably scared that FBI still involved.

Posted By: amused/not shocked (9:58am 06-25-2009)
Report Abuse


I sure would like to know which individuals at Workforce WV recieved subpoena notices in this case and what has been happening behind the scences at Workforce since May 8th. Until this article I thought the matter had been swept under the rug. I hope some disgruntled employee posts a comment or two and shed additional light on this mess.

Posted By: Eliz (8:14am 06-25-2009)
Report Abuse


Thank goodness that FBI agent James Lafferty and state Legislature Commission on Special Investigations agents Carl Hammons and Steven Staton are leading the Bowling investigation. Hopefully, these guys will investigate what kind of work at Comar and Vec3 did they use the grant money to pay consulting fees to Martin Bowling's fiancée, Mandi Felty, and Mary Jane Bowling's housemate, Christine Gardner, who runs West Virginia State University's Economic Development Center.
P.S. Eric....thanks for keeping this story alive!

Posted By: skepdoc (9:16pm 06-24-2009)
Report Abuse


Eric,

Keep up your yeoman's work on this story.If Nixon can take a tumble in DF, who knows who could get thrown under the bus in WV.

Can you get your hands on the presentncing report on dear l'il Martin? I think it'd be important for the people to be informed about EXACTLY what was presented to the judge just before she ever so casually and compassionately directed him away from prison. It was my understanding there was a lot of 'stuff' to be found in the report. Maybe it was too heavy to open.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here