May 19, 2009
Turnpike toll hearings begin
Advertiser

BELLE, W.Va. -- West Virginia Turnpike officials on Tuesday kicked off a series of public hearings on a proposed 60 percent toll hike, but not many people showed up.

 At the start of the hearing at Riverside High School in Belle, three people had signed up to speak on the potential increase, which could be approved as soon as next month.

The hearing was the first of four public meetings, which will continue through Friday.

In April, members of the state Parkways Authority began the process of raising tolls when they accepted two engineering reports on the road's maintenance needs and revenue forecasts.

Under the proposal, cars would pay $2 per barrier, up from the current $1.25. Commercial trucks would pay $6.75, up from $4.25.

Motorists could buy a West Virginia E-Z Pass to get a 25 percent discount on the tolls.

On Tuesday evening, Marmet resident Melvin Boyd told officials he vehemently opposed any toll hike.

"The people and the economy are in dire straits, and you are proposing a 60 percent increase," he said.

He questioned why the state couldn't use federal funds to help maintain the road, and suggested it impose $2 tolls on Interstate 64 between Charleston and Huntington, "where the politicians live."

"Why doesn't I-64 ever run out of money?" he asked

Boyd also said officials had already made up their mind about the tolls -- and held the public hearing for "legal purposes only." A few years ago, the authority raised rates, but a Kanawha County judge rolled them back because officials had not given proper public notice.

Joe Deneault, chairman of the group West Virginians for Better Transportation, said he "applauded the Parkways Authority for standing up and doing what is a very difficult task."

The state could face serious consequences if the Turnpike continues to lose money, he said after he spoke to officials. But he suggested that board members review toll rates more frequently so that motorists aren't hit with such huge hikes.

Tolls -- which haven't increased in 28 years -- are the 88-mile Turnpike's only source of operating funds. Turnpike officials say they must raise them because declining revenues and a maintenance backlog threaten their ability to meet debt service requirements.

Authority board members are scheduled to vote on the toll hike June 25, said Parkways Authority General Manager Greg Barr.

They also must adopt a new budget by July 1 -- and won't have enough revenue to satisfy debt service coverage tests if they don't raise tolls, he said.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: tshdwelady (4:54am 05-21-2009)
Report Abuse


So whom erases the comments that they choose are not to be seen by all???? I sent comment in yesterday and now you can not access. Like I said Turnpike tolls need to go, my family and I have been traveling back and forth on this road since 1987 several times a year from Eastern Panhandle of West Virginia to Charleston. I still do not notice any difference in the road conditions, so where is all the money going? Governor Mansion I would like to see info on how money is spent because its not used for the roads!!!! Roads need to be turned by over to WV DOH. So Mansion show me the money trail!!!

Posted By: CAPTAINJOE (7:55am 05-20-2009)
Report Abuse


As the other states begin to pull out of this recession, we, will just have to be content with eking out whatever we can from their pockets with our tolls when they cross over into our state. So, their first impression of us is going to be meeting someone with their hand out to use a road that wa said for with federal dollars. Does anyone else feel like a TROLL?
http://www.mrsc.org/focuspub/hearings.aspx

Posted By: CAPTAINJOE (10:04pm 05-19-2009)
Report Abuse


{url}http://www.mrsc.org/focuspub/hearings.aspx{/url}
its a done deal folks...

Posted By: CAPTAINJOE (10:02pm 05-19-2009)
Report Abuse


Public bodies, such as city councils, boards of county commissioners, and planning commissions, are sometimes required by state law to hold public hearings. Since the issues addressed in these public hearings are frequently contentious, may involve due process rights of private parties, and generate litigation, it is important to know and follow proper hearing procedures. Because these procedures are not generally spelled out in the statutes that require hearings, there is no ready guide for public bodies to follow when conducting hearings. This Focus issue discusses what is legally required for public hearings, with an emphasis on quasi-judicial hearings, and summarizes the basic procedures that should be followed. While following proper hearing procedures may not eliminate litigation over the issues addressed in hearings, it will help prevent having the decisions made following public hearings overturned by the courts on procedural grounds.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
MC CORMICK JEWELERS
A name you have know and trusted for over 60 years for honesty, quality and fair prices. The own...
Advertisement - Your ad here