January 15, 2009
State group seeks lawmakers' support for public financing act
Advertiser

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- West Virginia Citizens for Clean Elections is organizing meetings across the state in an effort to win support from legislators for the West Virginia Public Financing Act.

The group also is sponsoring a video contest about the proposed legislation.

When they convene next month, state legislators will consider the West Virginia Public Campaign Financing Act.

In 2008, candidates for 35 seats in the Senate and 100 seats in the House spent more than $4 million on their election campaigns.

The proposed legislation would give candidates public financing if they choose not to accept private donations and agree to follow campaign-spending limits.

Julie Archer, project manager for the West Virginia Citizen Action Group, said seven states, including Maine, Connecticut and Arizona, already have similar laws.

Today, 84 percent of Maine legislators and nine out of 11 statewide elected officials in Arizona, including Gov. Janet Napolitano, were elected under Clean Election laws.

Archer said, "West Virginia Citizens for Clean Elections supports and promotes public financing of legislative races in West Virginia as a way to free candidates from fundraising and allow them to spend more time talking with voters about the issues that concern them."

Citizens for Clean Elections, a coalition of faith-based, environmental, union and public interest, held its first public meeting in Charleston on Jan. 6.

The League of Women Voters of Wood County, a nonpartisan political group, is sponsoring the group's second meeting in Parkersburg on Jan. 26.

Public officials attending the Charleston meeting, co-sponsored by the Temple Israel Social Action Committee, included: Secretary of State-elect Natalie Tennant; Sen. Dan Foster, D-Kanawha; and Delegates Carrie Webster, Nancy Guthrie, Bobbie Hatfield, Danny Wells and Doug Skaff, all D-Kanawha.

Foster said recently, "Nobody likes to raise money. We like to talk to people and discuss issues - and that's not as big a factor as it should be."

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: reader (3:39pm 01-15-2009)
Report Abuse


Another name for this idea is voter-owned elections. The drift being that if we, the voters, finance the campaigns (at a cost of about $6 per household) then the legislators will generate better public policy and laws that benifit the general public rather than the wealthy special interests that front the $ for elections at present. As Molly ivans used to say "Them that pays the piper gets to call the tunes"

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
MOUNTAINEER MANUFACTURING INC
Manufacturing-Machine shop, jobbing and repair services; boring mill; manufactures iron or steel ...
Advertisement - Your ad here