DUNBAR, W.Va. - Dunbar city officials are backing off a decision to charge a research fee to give out public information.
On Monday, Dunbar City Council approved an ordinance to charge $10 an hour to look up public information for people who file requests under the state Freedom of Information Act. The city would also charge 35 cents a page to make copies of city documents under the ordinance.
The Freedom of Information Act requires governmental bodies and other public agencies to provide public information to anyone who makes a request under the provisions of the act. While many public bodies around the state provide the information for free, state law says, "The public body may establish fees reasonably calculated to reimburse it for its actual cost in making reproductions of such records."
Dunbar City Councilwoman Connie Boardman said city officials think it's reasonable to charge the public for the time it takes to look up records. She said the city employees who have to look up the records are short-staffed, and have to spend a lot of time looking up public documents.
Boardman said the two clerks who are mostly responsible for looking up the records make $12 and $14 an hour. "What's reasonable?" Boardman asked. "If the clerk makes $12 or $14 an hour, $10 is reasonable, isn't it?"
Other cities in Kanawha County don't charge the public a fee to look up information.
"I don't think I'd be in favor of that," said South Charleston Mayor Frank Mullens. "That's part of our job, to give information to the public."
Many municipalities and other agencies around the state charge a few cents per page to photocopy public records. St. Albans Mayor Dick Callaway said city officials give members of the public the first five pages of a public document free, then charge 25 cents a page for copies after that. He said city officials do not charge a research fee to look up information to comply with Freedom of Information Act requests.
It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The Charleston Gazette.
- Most Popular
- Most Commented
- Skull found at W.Va. construction site
- A deathbed wish fulfilled
- Fourth of July festival organizers fear violence
- Mother arrested after West Side toddler shoots himself in the leg
- Big kids only: Teenagers wanted a place to call their own
- Marion County deputy accused of sending nude photos to teen
- FLIPSIDE: 'Twilight' bites into Town Center
- 'Mountain State' no more? Opponents of surface mining hold naming contest (18 Comments)
- Feds: DEP does not properly oversee mining flood prevention (17 Comments)
- New prisons, shorter sentences recommended to reduce Corrections system overcrowding (14 Comments)
- Hate crime (14 Comments)
- Carte Goodwin may run for Congress (13 Comments)
- McDowell delegate vows to stop traffic to protest tolls (12 Comments)
- John Warner: Left equals rights (10 Comments)



Post a comment
''state law says, "The public body may establish fees reasonably calculated to reimburse it for its actual cost in making reproductions of such records''
i may be reading this wrong, but it says ''actual cost in making reproduction of such records'' where does it say you can charge a fee for research? looks like you can only charge a fee to copy records