CHARLESTON, W.Va. - With a new $100,000 federal grant, a promised $2 million earmark and earlier commitments for about $1.3 million, backers of the proposed Kanawha Trestle Trail project on Monday reached out for still more money.
Charleston City Council members approved a resolution Monday that calls for Mayor Danny Jones to sign a $250,000 Transportation Enhancement grant application.
The application seeks to tap the same source - federal "TE" funds - that provided $100,000 late last year, said Dennis Strawn, a spokesmen for the group that has been pushing the project for several years.
Members of Friends of the Kanawha Trestle Trail hope to convert the 100-year-old abandoned railroad trestle that crosses the Kanawha River near Patrick Street to a hiking and biking bridge that will connect to trails on both sides of the river. On the north side of the river, trails would extend west to North Charleston and east through the West Side.
Phase two of the project includes conversion of a second bridge, the old Whipple railroad bridge over the Elk River, and trails to Capitol Market and Laidley Field in the East End.
The friends group is awaiting word from Washington on the status of $2 million that Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., earmarked last year in the Senate Appropriations Committee. The funding must still be approved by the full Senate and House of Representatives.
"I can't even begin to speculate about that," Strawn said Monday. He previously suggested the earmark might stand a better chance of success under a Democratic administration.
Strawn told members of council's Finance Committee that state Highways officials notified him about the $100,000 TE grant on Nov. 21.
Each year the Division of Highways divides up a pool of federal TE money to projects across the state. "We're going back to ask for more," he said.
It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The Charleston Gazette.
- Most Popular
- Most Commented
- 'Mountain State' no more? Opponents of surface mining hold naming contest (19 Comments)
- Feds: DEP does not properly oversee mining flood prevention (18 Comments)
- Hate crime (14 Comments)
- New prisons, shorter sentences recommended to reduce Corrections system overcrowding (13 Comments)
- McDowell delegate vows to stop traffic to protest tolls (12 Comments)
- Carte Goodwin may run for Congress (11 Comments)
- Taco Bell shooter gets life sentence (9 Comments)



Post a comment
I really have serious reservations about the time and money spent on this project.
I'm sure the supporters are noble in the cause BUT here are some glaring facts about it:
#1 The Patrick St. Bridge is just a few hundred feet downriver from the RR bridge. Couldn't it be a much cheaper alternative to cross the river on the trail?
#2 One beginning/ending point of the RR bridge is very near the city sewer treatment plant with pleasant smells all summer!
#3 The other end of the bridge drops into a crime ridden area of the West Side.
#4 The east end of the trail ends in another crime ridden area of the East End.
Will security be provided?
Otherwise I would liken it to visiting LA and opting out of a stroll along the Redondo Beach boardwalk to take a ride through East LA. No responsible parent would take their family into an area like that.