September 27, 2008
Number of W.Va. babies born underweight rises
State leads national trend
Advertiser

West Virginia mothers are delivering a higher percentage of low-birth-weight babies in recent years than they have at any time during the past 25 years, according to a new study.

The state's percentage of underweight babies has increased steadily from a low of 5.8 percent in 1982 to a high of 8.2 percent in 2006, the most recent year data was available. That's about 1,700 low-birth-weight infants born that year. 

West Virginia ranks No. 1 in the nation in the percentage of underweight babies born to white women, according to the state Health Statistics Center report.

The numbers point to a "dire forecast" unless something is done to reverse the increase in low-birth-weight babies, researchers concluded.  

"We have to be concerned about this trend upward," said Jim Doria, statistical services unit manager at the Health Statistics Center. "If we don't intervene, we'll be caught in a perpetual cycle of negative health outcomes associated with low birth weights."

The report determined that mothers who themselves were born underweight - 5 1/2 pounds or less - were much more likely to have low-birth-weight babies.

Underweight babies are more likely to die in their first year of life.

"It's a major cause of infant death," Doria said. "It's the most significant indication of infant survival."

Low birth weights also are linked to long-term disabilities, such as cerebral palsy, autism, mental retardation, diabetes, and vision and hearing impairments.

The cost of delivering a low-birth-weight baby at a hospital averages about three times as much as a normal-weight infant.

The study excluded mothers who had twins or multiple births, because those babies tend to be smaller and would have skewed the study's findings, Doria said. 

The increase of underweight infants comes despite statewide efforts - led by children's advocacy groups - to lower the percentage of low-birth-weight babies. The state's Healthy People 2010 initiative, for instance, set a goal to reduce the percentage of underweight babies to 5 percent - a target that now seems unreachable.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: Anonymous (2:30pm 09-29-2008)
Report Abuse


Look at the people in this state. Look at the women smoking around the hospital. It's hard not to assume a few things.

Anyhow, I never said it was every mother. Some try to avoid anything that would hurt the developing baby, like my wife and you, apparently.

Posted By: Anonymous (1:35pm 09-29-2008)
Report Abuse


I am neither obese, nor do I smoke, yet I had what is considered an "underweight" baby earlier this year. That was due to my placenta failing to work during the last two weeks of my pregnancy.

Do not "assume" anything, especially about something such as this. For instance, I "assume" you do not have children ...

Any decent mother takes care of herself while pregnant. Of course there are those that don't but do not judge everyone because of what you decide you see. The people you view could merely be visitors for all you know.

Posted By: Anonymous (5:08pm 09-28-2008)
Report Abuse


Well, I'm shocked! Go take a look at all the obese, chain-smoking mothers to be hanging around Women and Children's Hospital. That couldn't have anything to do with it, no way.

Posted By: Anonymous (12:05am 09-28-2008)
Report Abuse


Maybe you shouldn't be having babies when you are on welfare!

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
PRECISION TUNE
Precision Tune Auto Care is the fast, convenient and affordable solution to all of your car repai...
Advertisement - Your ad here