July 27, 2008
Another review, another list of MSHA enforcement lapses
Advertiser

Read the independent review.

Five months before the Crandall Canyon Mine disaster in Utah, mine officials told a federal inspector about a massive "bump" that blew out two entire coal pillars.

But the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration never investigated the accident.

MSHA officials were concerned about the dangers of Murray Energy's plan to remove more coal pillars that were holding up the roof of the 2,000-foot-deep mine. But agency inspectors who visited the mine never specifically examined this active "retreat mining."

And once six miners became trapped by a catastrophic mine collapse on Aug. 6, 2007, federal officials allowed the miners' families to be misled. Top MSHA officials didn't correct incomplete and misleading company statements that gave the families a "false sense of hope."

Last week, an independent review of the Crandall Canyon disaster found these and more among a long list of major mistakes by federal regulators charged with protecting the health and safety of the nation's miners.

It was the fourth such stinging review for MSHA in the last two years, following agency interview reviews of the deaths at the Sago and Aracoma mines in West Virginia and the Darby mine in Kentucky.

Sen. Robert C. Byrd, D-W.Va., said it was "alarming that such lapses in oversight could have happened so soon" after the three major coal industry accidents in 2006.

"These tragic events provide a very clear demonstration of what has happened to MSHA over the last seven years under the Bush administration," said Cecil Roberts, president of the United Mine Workers union. "It has become a coddler of coal companies, not an enforcer of law and regulation."

Roberts and Rep. Nick J. Rahall, D-W.Va., said it's time to look beyond the Bush administration, and hope for new management at MSHA.

"The independent investigative report on Crandall Canyon confirms that the reforms now underway need to be completed and that [the] next administration must provide the agency with sufficient budgetary resources and accountable leadership to ensure that the health and safety of miners is always MSHA's uppermost priority," Rahall said.

Major lapses at MSHA are nothing new, and didn't begin when George W. Bush became president in January 2001.

Over the last 20 years, reports on each of the nation's major mining accidents have found that MSHA inspectors overlooked major violations of safety rules intended to protect miners.

Over and over, MSHA officials missed safety violations, did not take harsh enough enforcement action or ensure that problems were fixed, according to government reports.

Seven internal MSHA reviews published between 1990 and 2003 found that agency supervisors did not properly train inspectors or make MSHA requirements clear to them. Top agency managers did not do enough to ensure that far-flung district offices were doing a good job, the reviews found.

In a response to the Crandall Canyon review, acting MSHA chief Richard Stickler said his agency welcomes chances to improve and has already implemented many of the recommendations.

But such statements have come after most of the previous MSHA reviews.

Just last year, Stickler described the findings of the Sago, Aracoma and Darby interview reviews as "deeply disturbing." He said the reports "show an unacceptable lack of accountability and oversight that will not be tolerated."

U.S. Labor Secretary Elaine Chao, who commissioned the unusual Crandall Canyon review by two retired MSHA officials, made no such comments this time.

In a short prepared statement, Chao noted that the review "reported on the circumstances surrounding the tragedy and steps that should be taken to help prevent a recurrence."

"Over the last two years, MSHA has implemented numerous improvements to better protect the safety and health of America's miners," the statement said.

The statement referred to the hiring of more than 300 new coal inspectors, finalizing six new rules and proposing four other regulations.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: PaulRupp (12:01am 07-28-2008)
Report Abuse


Out west in Nevada,Msha and Nevada Mine Safety Training Section go out of their way to NOT investigate formal complaints,verbal or written.Hand delivered letter to current NV Gov. does not appear to get results. Like everything else in America, Big Money ALWAYS gets it's way. We can not trust our goverment to do the one thing that is job number one,that is... to protect the citizen. So why do we have Msha and Nevada MSATS and other State safety agencies if they will not follow the laws that are in place to protect the working miner?

Posted By: Kris (2:26pm 07-27-2008)
Report Abuse


MSHA has been lax in addressing mine in more ways than just failing to address miners underground. Miners are being exposed to hazardous chemichals such as acrylamide, reagent, ethyleneglycol, and magnatite to name a few. MSHA, along with our representatives Rahal, Byrd, and Rockefeller, have all been made aware of the chemical hazards and have failed to protect miners from the hazards related to the chemicals used in the mining industry.
The mine acadamy in Beaver West Virginia has safety literature on everything from how to lift properly, to operating continuous miners.
However there is no safety literature on the chemicals as listed above.
It is time for all miners to ASK how these chemicals can harm. the company doctors, and workers compensation's doctors have failed to protect employees and will continue to do so until more people ask!

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here