July 26, 2008
Agreement said WVU Research Corp. would insure Carbide
Advertiser

CHARLESTON, W.Va. - In a canceled agreement that would have established a research campus in South Charleston, Union Carbide Corp. required WVU Research Corp. to cover it under general liability insurance for the site, according to the donation agreement between the two parties.

Both parties signed the agreement last August. Union Carbide - now a wholly owned subsidiary of the Dow Chemical Co. - had planned to donate 58 acres at its Technology Park to WVU Research Corp., which would hold classes for engineering students and rent space for private research.

Last week, each company announced that it had agreed to cancel the deal because "insurance requirements satisfactory to both the Research Corporation's needs and obligations and to [Union Carbide] could not be obtained." Initially, the parties had set a closing date of Oct. 31, 2007. That was later extended to July 11, 2008.

The Saturday Gazette-Mail obtained the agreement Friday through the state's Freedom of Information Act.

According to the agreement, Union Carbide agreed to indemnify WVU Research Corp. for certain environmental liabilities that could arise from contamination in the property's soil or groundwater. Those would include environmentally related claims stemming from personal injury or illness, property damage, environmental clean-up costs, natural resource damages, fines and penalties.

The agreement also required WVU Research Corp. to buy commercial general liability insurance for the site that would cover damages related to bodily injury, disease, death or damages. Carbide would be named in the policy as an additional insured.

If WVU Research Corp. ever failed to maintain that insurance policy, Carbide no longer would provide environmental indemnification, according to the agreement.

Dow spokeswoman Rosemarie Rung said Carbide required the general liability insurance because WVU Research Corp. "could essentially go broke" if it weren't insured and someone sued it for damages unrelated to the site's environmental condition.

Rung said WVU Research Corp. did secure general liability insurance. The problem arose, she said, when it sought environmental liability insurance.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: know (9:40pm 08-30-2008)
Report Abuse


To biggerpie: Give the public evidence of your proclamation/expertise. Then, answer why WVU, with all its expertise, did NOT establish Dow with its WVU students even though WVU was willing to place the Tech student on this contaminated property.

This property had to present significant danger to its occupants--due to failure to obtain sufficient insurance coverage.

Biggerpie should do more investigative work. WVU turned down the very deal for which the Fayette and surrounding counties were criticized for refusing to accept for their Leonard C. Nelson College of Engineering in Montgomery.

Posted By: biggerpie (11:56am 07-27-2008)
Report Abuse


The 'environmental issues' at the Dow Park are no greater or less than would be found in any building or on land used for chemistry labs in Morgantown, Montgomery or Huntington. The opportunity to have higher ed interact with experienced R&D experts in technical fields and to promote efforts to retain highly educated individuals should not be limited by a pervasive scarcity mentality which causes some to beleive that any efforts in one place in WV automatically means that another place must lose. Successful 21st century economy is built around collaboration and some concentration of technical skills that attempt to address real world issues and opportunities. Unlike many of our surrounding states, West Virginia has not consciouly created those collaborative environments that build and sustain new knowledge based business. Thus we place our future on the hopes that some large company will move here and provide 21st century jobs rather than strive to create them internally.

Posted By: theobvious? (7:36pm 07-26-2008)
Report Abuse


Are there any Fayette County politicians or members of the Tech administration questioning these events concerning the contaminated property at Dow? The people in charge of making the decision to move the LCN College of Engineering in 2006--Bayless, Hardesty, Manchin, and McCabe--were placing the Tech population at Dow 'overnight.' Within the last few months, Bayless even stated that he was disappointed that the move was stopped; that the entire college could have already been in position at Dow, and Tech would have been another Virginia Tech in 15 years.

Wow, what a proclamation of inept leadership!!

Posted By: knowing (2:05pm 07-26-2008)
Report Abuse


If WVU truly wanted the engineering program to grow in Montgomery, it could and would. History gives that verification.

I predict that five years from now, the general public will still be asking the same questions about Tech and getting, if not half-truths, no answers at all.

WVU has another opportunity to perform on the Montgomery campus. Let's see what they do. They have said for 12 years that Tech's affiliation with WVU is Tech's only chance of survival. We don't want "Just Survival." The citiens of West Virginia expect more.

Public, please continue to watch and ask.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
MC CORMICK JEWELERS
A name you have know and trusted for over 60 years for honesty, quality and fair prices. The own...
Advertisement - Your ad here