News
July 20, 2008
Six presidential hopefuls could make ballot
Advertisement - Your ad here

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- There could be as many as six presidential candidates on West Virginia's ballot this fall, the most state officials can recall.

Three will be on the ballot automatically, including Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama. The state Mountain Party has become a branch of the national Green Party, which chose former Georgia Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney as its presidential nominee earlier this month. She will be on the ballot under the Mountain Party.

"We haven't received any official notification [from the Mountain Party], but that's what's going to happen," said Jason Williams, who heads the secretary of state's election division.

Other candidates must submit petitions to gain access to the ballot. Each candidate, or party, must submit the valid signatures of 2 percent of West Virginians who voted in the last presidential election. For 2008, that figure is 15,118.

"We always suggest they get 5 percent more," Williams said.

Candidates have until Aug. 1 to submit the names to the Secretary of State's Office. From there, they will be forwarded to county clerks in all 55 counties to check to make certain the person signing is a registered voter and that it appears to be that person's signature.

Independent candidate Ralph Nader, Constitution Party nominee Chuck Baldwin and Libertarian Party candidate Bob Barr all are making moves to get on the state's ballot.

They will have an easier time this year, Williams said, because Nader's campaign went to court in 2004 to challenge a state law that forced candidates to submit their petitions before the May primary election. Because of the court ruling, that date has been changed to Aug. 1.

Soon after that date, state officials must submit ballots to be printed. That will push county clerks to validate signatures more quickly.

"It'll be interesting," Williams said.

Nader, who earlier this year broke away from the Green Party, a party that had previously nominated him for president, has a leg up on the others. His campaign submitted about 11,000 signatures in June and already has more than 7,000 signatures validated, Williams said. Since then, Nader's campaign has submitted more petitions that are being validated.

Williams said that usually, about 70 percent of the signatures on ballot petitions are valid.

"We are very close," said Albert Marino, a Texas native who is heading Nader's West Virginia petition drive. "In fact, we have well over the 15,000 signatures needed. Right now we are working on a buffer zone."

The Nader effort started about six weeks ago, he said.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: OldBookGuy (8:37pm 07-20-2008)
Report Abuse


I too am glad there will be other choices, viable, no, but really better then the two front runners.

Careful though, the names can get ya.

Take for instance the Constitutional Party, a quick read of the party platform, ummm, anything but. Then again if you want your private life legislated to you I guess they are OK. Then again, you should or could just choose either the Democrat or Republican candidate, pick your poison there.

Me. I like small government, privacy, personal freedom and of-course the personal responsibility it entails.

I'll choose Bob Barr, bobbarr2008.com

obg

Posted By: wvcitizen (4:11pm 07-20-2008)
Report Abuse


The fact that there is a Constitution party is good evidence of just where the two major parties, that have long dominated, truly stand--i.e. shredding the Constitution and trampling it to the right or to the left.

Either the Constitution is supreme law (which they all lie and swear to uphold before God) or we have defacto anarchists of either the "conservative" or "liberal" label, not much different than the King George and Parliament (of Tories and Whigs) we through off in 1776.

While republicans condemn judges that "legislate from the bench" they have no problem legislating from Executive order (when a republican is there) or legislating thru Congress against the Constitution. This is pure hypocrisy which is the fruits of party loyalty above constitutional principle.

Unless people want to be oppressed under some form of tyranny, either a Democrat Nanny State (communism) or Republican Security State (fascism) they better pony up again to restore Constitutional order--now!

It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The Charleston Gazette.

Click here to order home delivery.

Advertisement - Your ad here