Community continues to question slaying of Nalisha Gravely
Four days after Nalisha Fiona Gravely was killed inside a Taco Bell on Charleston's West Side, people continued to ask how she ended up dead, the apparent victim of Desmond Clark, a man with an extensive criminal record but few convictions.
Four days after Nalisha Fiona Gravely was killed inside a Taco Bell on Charleston's West Side, people continued to ask how she ended up dead, the apparent victim of Desmond Clark, a man with an extensive criminal record but few convictions.
Plastic containers adorned with fliers solicit donations for Nalisha Fiona Gravely’s funeral. The fundraiser netted more than $800. Another will be held today on Patrick Street.
Gravely's cousin Charles Williams stood outside an Advance Auto Parts store on Charleston's West Side on Tuesday. Friends and family gathered there for a car wash and fish fry, raising more than $800 for Gravely's family.
"They kept letting him out. If he would have been in jail, this wouldn't have happened," Williams said. "He kept walking. This should have stopped a long time ago."
Clark is accused of killing Gravely, the mother of his 2-year-old son. He allegedly shot her while they were in a car together after he abducted her from a North Charleston house around 2 p.m. Saturday.
Gravely ran inside the Taco Bell on Patrick Street, where she asked to use a phone, and then jumped across the counter to hide in a closet. Police say Clark followed across the counter, found Gravely in the closet and shot her six times.
Clark, 22, was not supposed to have a gun for many reasons. He was a convicted felon after a plea to possession with intent to distribute marijuana. He had also pleaded guilty to domestic battery, which also barred him from having a firearm.
He was charged at least 17 times in four years for often-violent offenses tied to domestic battery, drugs, wanton endangerment, burglary and weapons.
In March 2007, Clark cut his electronic bracelet while he was on home confinement. He remained at large until he was arrested on July 3, court records indicate.
Three days later, a corrections officer at South Central Regional Jail charged Clark with battery, alleging that Clark tried to slam him to the floor by picking him up off the ground after refusing to return to his section.
He later posted bond and was returned to home confinement. By the time he was placed on probation in March 2008, his bond had been modified at his attorney's request to let him off of home confinement.
According to a search warrant filed in Kanawha Magistrate Court on Tuesday, Clark had several bullets and a key to a Mazda Protégé in his pockets when he was arrested on July 6. Police later found a Smith & Wesson Model 4046 pistol in a white Mazda Protégé parked near where Clark was arrested.
Sources inside the law enforcement and legal system and close to the Gravely family said Tuesday that Clark was a confidential informant for police, but Charleston police said that he didn't work for them.
Sgt. S.A. Cooper, chief detective for Charleston police said Clark was not a confidential informant, or CI, for the department's criminal investigation division.
"I can't imagine he received any special treatment as a CI based on the types of crimes he is charged with," Cooper said. "He has never been a CI here, and I've never heard of him being a CI."
Four days after Nalisha Fiona Gravely was killed inside a Taco Bell on Charleston's West Side, people continued to ask how she ended up dead, the apparent victim of Desmond Clark, a man with an extensive criminal record but few convictions.
Gravely's cousin Charles Williams stood outside an Advance Auto Parts store on Charleston's West Side on Tuesday. Friends and family gathered there for a car wash and fish fry, raising more than $800 for Gravely's family.
"They kept letting him out. If he would have been in jail, this wouldn't have happened," Williams said. "He kept walking. This should have stopped a long time ago."
Clark is accused of killing Gravely, the mother of his 2-year-old son. He allegedly shot her while they were in a car together after he abducted her from a North Charleston house around 2 p.m. Saturday.
Gravely ran inside the Taco Bell on Patrick Street, where she asked to use a phone, and then jumped across the counter to hide in a closet. Police say Clark followed across the counter, found Gravely in the closet and shot her six times.
Clark, 22, was not supposed to have a gun for many reasons. He was a convicted felon after a plea to possession with intent to distribute marijuana. He had also pleaded guilty to domestic battery, which also barred him from having a firearm.
He was charged at least 17 times in four years for often-violent offenses tied to domestic battery, drugs, wanton endangerment, burglary and weapons.
In March 2007, Clark cut his electronic bracelet while he was on home confinement. He remained at large until he was arrested on July 3, court records indicate.
Three days later, a corrections officer at South Central Regional Jail charged Clark with battery, alleging that Clark tried to slam him to the floor by picking him up off the ground after refusing to return to his section.
He later posted bond and was returned to home confinement. By the time he was placed on probation in March 2008, his bond had been modified at his attorney's request to let him off of home confinement.
According to a search warrant filed in Kanawha Magistrate Court on Tuesday, Clark had several bullets and a key to a Mazda Protégé in his pockets when he was arrested on July 6. Police later found a Smith & Wesson Model 4046 pistol in a white Mazda Protégé parked near where Clark was arrested.
Sources inside the law enforcement and legal system and close to the Gravely family said Tuesday that Clark was a confidential informant for police, but Charleston police said that he didn't work for them.
Sgt. S.A. Cooper, chief detective for Charleston police said Clark was not a confidential informant, or CI, for the department's criminal investigation division.
"I can't imagine he received any special treatment as a CI based on the types of crimes he is charged with," Cooper said. "He has never been a CI here, and I've never heard of him being a CI."
Cooper said he wouldn't know if other officers were using Clark as a CI. Lists of confidential informants aren't shared among agencies unless someone asks, he said.
"If he is, it wouldn't be the first time a guy who has done CI work has committed a crime," Cooper said.
Lt. C.A. Carpenter, head of the Metro Drug Unit, said Clark wasn't an informant for his agency. His history as a violent criminal would have precluded him from becoming an informant, he said.
"I am telling you unequivocally that he has never been an informant for the drug unit," Carpenter said. "Nor would he have been if he had approached us and asked. He would have been told no."
A Dunbar officer pulled Clark and Gravely over early Saturday morning on a routine traffic stop. Clark's car was searched and he was cited for possession of marijuana and driving on a suspended license.
Gravely also gave no indication that she was in danger from Clark, or that he was holding her against her will, said Dunbar Police Chief Earl Whittington.
Gravely had a domestic violence protective order against Clark, but that didn't show up when Dunbar officers checked for outstanding warrants on Clark through the Kanawha County Sheriff's Department, Whittington said. The Sheriff's Department's system doesn't include all information from Charleston police, he said.
Whittington also said he had no knowledge of Clark being an informant for police.
The state Crime Victims Compensation Fund has already agreed to pay for Gravely's funeral, but just when the money will come is isn't known, said Lisa Groves, a friend of Gravely's family.
She held a bucket to collect money Tuesday outside Advance Auto Parts for the Gravely family.
"We want to get out here and raise some awareness," said Groves, who said she was a victim of domestic violence herself.
While many people showed up to support Gravely's family, they were also concerned about their own safety. Several didn't want to speak for fear of retaliation from friends of Clark.
Clark has been calling friends from inside South Central Regional Jail and telling them to harass Gravely's family members, according to one person who did not wish to be named.
"I fault the system," said one man who was close to Gravely. "He should have been locked up. I knew I should have killed [Clark], for real."
Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, sexually explicit, racist or offensive will be removed. If you wouldn�t say it to your mother, don�t post it here.
Be civil. Don�t threaten to hurt anyone. Personal attacks, insults or harassment of any kind are subject to removal.
Be truthful. Don�t lie about a situation or person.
Keep it brief. Keep your comment to one post. Redundant or multiple posts in a row aren�t allowed.
Stay on task. Stick to the topics relevant to the story and discussion.
Let us know about offensive comments. Click the �Report Abuse� button if you think a comment is against the rules.
Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
Posted By: sum1sad(12:22am 07-25-2008)
Report Abuse
"Noexcusesforignorance" Sorry but I have to call you out. If you think the Dunbar police officer did everything he was suppose to do that day you ARE WRONG!!!!!!!!!! He should have taken Clark to jail, he had no license, no proof on insurance, marajuana, and he was still suppose to be on house arrest, and last but now less he wasn't suppose to be near Gravely because of her protection order that she had against him. Their were probably times that she may not have showed up for court, but you have to think why would she didn't want to face Clark in the court room when he would get out of jail and then a couple days later he would force her to go with him against her will again because he's back in the street. You must not know what your talking about because she did press charges. Plenty of times!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted By: Mad(11:47pm 07-11-2008)
Report Abuse
They can say what they wanted. He worked for the police. When they thing las suits they will hid what ever needs to be hidden. Cover up. The bad thing is there has not been any big drug bust in Charleston in how long. So what information was he giving them. CI you better think about what you are doing. They are good to you when they need you. And when they are finished with you it will be in the Charleston Gazette whom all you have told on and it will be on the front page. Let the Police do their own work and stop using you. CI will tell on another drug dealer but not on a murder. We still have murders that have not been solved, and the police knows who the people are that has the information. But just let them kill each other and we don't have to worrie about. What has this world come too. This is very sad. I would not bring a child into this world to at all.
Posted By: Dunbar PD(6:22pm 07-11-2008)
Report Abuse
My nephew got stopped in Dunbar and had expired license{not suspended}& before we could get to Dunbar from Cross Lanes they had already shipped him downtown and was headed to South Central.No warning,no ticket,straight to jail.We excepted this because we thought this was protocol for this offense.The officer in Dunbar that stopped Clark should have done likewise with Clark.I'm quite sure they knew who he was and his history.If he had truly ran him through the computer I'm sure that some of his record showed up and he knew who he was dealing with,maybe this is why he let him go.True Clark pulled the trigger,but the police and judicial system gave him the freedom to do so.Blame is being placed rightfully where it belongs.
First and foremost the blame game needs to stop. Clark pulled the trigger, he is the ONE to blame. Now, as for the numerous ignorant (un-educated) comments that have been posted on this article... The Dunbar Police Dept did exactly what they were supposed to do. READ the paper, or pay attention to the news when you watch it. Clark was cited for both charges and the vehicle towed. If you don't agree with someone being cited for those charges then you have an issue with state law, not the officer. The court system may have been too lenient at times, however, no one has mentioned this fact. The main reason most charges were dropped was because the victim wouldnt cooperate with the prosecution. I understand she may have feared Clark, but nothing can be done if you don't pursue the charges. The courts in many cases have no other option than to let someone go if the victim doesnt show. I am in NO way blaming the victim for her death. Like I said Clark is the triggerman. Please stop blaming
Post a comment