June 15, 2008
Ex-justice describes abuse of debtors
Arbitration system gamed, Neely tells business magazine
Page 2 of 2
Advertiser

"One person owed $1,300 on a credit card. Then, long after the account was closed, it had run up a debt of $9,800. That is not uncommon," he said.

Today, NAF employs about 1,700 "freelance arbitrators" across the country, BusinessWeek reports. Most are lawyers or retired judges. They handle about 200,000 cases a year.

Consumers typically play minimal roles in those arbitrations and 93.7 percent of those cases are decided without the consumers ever responding, BusinessWeek reported.

Only three-tenths of 1 percent of all those consumers asked for a hearing.

NAF markets its arbitration services to a variety of huge companies, including the Bank of America and JP Morgan Chase.

And NAF pays its arbitrators well.

Anita Shapiro, a former superior court judge in Los Angeles, told BusinessWeek that NAF paid her $300 an hour.

Shapiro said she usually spent only "four to five minutes per arbitration" and that she routinely completed "10 to 12 an hour."

Bland said if consumer debt cases went to court, judges would require proof of all debts, interest and fees.

"An NAF arbitrator only spends a few minutes on cases where consumers default. And debt-buyers often buy cases from banks relating to people who legitimately owe $1,000, but suddenly owe many thousands of dollars."

Bland also criticized banks for making efforts "on a massive scale to send credit cards to college students, who have no income, and to developmentally disabled people.

"We have found an enormous number of consumers that never got any notice of arbitration awards against them," Bland added. "And we even found 20 consumers where documents established they had been victims of identity theft.

"But nonetheless, arbitrators entered judgments against them," Bland said. "Banks win inflated sums. And no one is keeping track." 

To contact staff writer Paul J. Nyden, use e-mail or call 348-5164.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: Nancy (9:12pm 06-15-2008)
Report Abuse


NAF, AAA, CAS, all arbitration services are nothing but shills for big business. They market themselves to corporate America as a way to avoid legal accountability and boy does it work. It is a crime that Americans have lost their 7th amendment right through lengthy, fine print, contracts of adhesion. You can't make a purchase or sign a contract for anything today without signing away your Constitutional rights. The clauses are in everything from credit cards, purchasing a home, going to the doctor, and even when being admitted to a nursing home. If they kill your Mother through neglect -- oh well!! Don't expect to be able to hold them accountable in a court of law. And don't expect to learn which nursing homes are abusing the elderly because these arbitrations are nearly always secret with no public record.

Posted By: probono (4:21pm 06-15-2008)
Report Abuse


mismanners,
Let's hope you never have a personal disaster that strikes you or your family, such as cancer, tragic auto accident, business closing or layoff that wipes out your income and drains your savings. Then we might see how fast you pay off that $1,000 credit card bill.

Posted By: missmanners (4:04pm 06-15-2008)
Report Abuse


I guess you should have paid the debts back when they were $1000 then, huh? I don't have a lot of sympathy for ya. Did you not know how interest worked?

Posted By: Cindy (3:53pm 06-15-2008)
Report Abuse


The courts rarely refuse to enforce an arbitration award, though in the rare case a consumer wins, the courts do no more to help them collect than if it were litigation. I volunteer for a consumer org and we get lots of complaints about homebuilders and home warranty companies. Arbitration clauses are extremely common, and strip homeowners of important legal rights and leverage. Plus, arbitration keeps most of these complaints secret so others can't find out and choose to avoid companies based on their record. If a homeowner/consumer wins, they may get only a fraction of their actual damages in arbitration, then still never collect. We've heard virtually nothing but bad news from homeowners about arbitration. Arbitrators seem able to ignore the law and favor the corporation, ignoring evidence that the corporation was the wrong-doer. These clauses need to be made unenforceable, so that parties can choose how to resolve disputes after they arise and make informed choices.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here