News
February 24, 2008
McGraw defends spending of settlement cash
State $2 billion richer, attorney general says

Countering criticism that his office has misspent lawsuit settlement money, Attorney General Darrell McGraw says he has put $2 billion of nontaxpayer money into state coffers during the past 15 years.

The overwhelming majority of that money - 97 percent of the total - went directly to the state Legislature to help balance the state annual budgets, said McGraw.

The $2 billion came from dozens of settlements and verdicts McGraw won from suits filed against companies marketing harmful products and against businesses committing consumer fraud.

Another 2.7 percent of the $2 billion went directly to consumers who were defrauded, while 0.3 percent was spent as designated by court orders, McGraw said.

That final category includes the $10 million settlement McGraw negotiated with Purdue Pharma L.P. for marketing and advertising OxyContin, a highly addictive painkiller sometimes called "hillbilly heroin."

Last month, the West Virginia Chamber of Commerce and the Business and Industrial Council began airing television and radio ads attacking McGraw, accusing him of misspending the $10 million OxyContin settlement.

The television ads "cost in the range of several hundred thousand dollars," according to Chamber President Steve Roberts.

The West Virginia Record, a weekly paper financed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, has repeatedly attacked expenditures from the OxyContin settlement.

The lawsuit specifically criticized Purdue's "direct marketing efforts to physicians indicating OxyContin was a first-line treatment for osteo-arthritis for women, even after the Federal Drug Administration warned Purdue it could not promote it as a first-line defense drug," said Managing Deputy Attorney General Fran Hughes.

The settlement was reached on Nov. 4, 2004, during discussions on the McDowell County Courthouse steps, just before a trial was scheduled to begin before Circuit Judge Booker Stephens.

A week before, McGraw's lawyers rejected a Pharma offer to settle the suit for $2 million, said Managing Deputy Attorney General Barbara H. Allen.

During settlement negotiations, Pharma's own lawyers insisted that the settlement money be used in three ways.

"That was their demand as part of the settlement," Hughes said. "They insisted that the money should go to finance community programs to help drug abusers, law enforcement aimed at reducing substance abuse and medical education to further reduce substance abuse."

Pharma hoped to gain some positive public relations coverage for playing an ongoing role funding programs to help addicted individuals, Hughes added.

Advertiser
Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.

It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The Charleston Gazette.

Click here to order home delivery.

Advertiser
Advertiser