November 28, 2009
Kanawha coal operator played role in evolution saga
Rick Steelhammer
Bellefleur, the former home of coal operator and internationally known butterfly expert William Henry Edwards, still stands on a bluff overlooking the Kanawha River at Coalburg.
Courtesy photo
A wicker chair at Bellefleur is the setting for this late 19th Century portrait of Edwards in his prime. West Virginia State Archives
Advertiser

COALBURG, W.Va. -- In the closing decades of the 19th century, Bellefleur, the two-story home with wraparound verandas on an eight-acre estate overlooking the Kanawha River at Coalburg, was best known as the residence of pioneer coal operator William Henry Edwards.

But the rural estate was also the place where Edwards produced definitive works on the butterflies of North America, and conducted groundbreaking studies on polymorphism and natural selection among butterflies.

Edwards' work has been linked to the work of Alfred Russel<co > Wallace, Henry Walter Bates and other naturalists credited with developing the theory of evolution, brought to international attention 150 years ago this week, when Charles Darwin's "On the Origin of Species" was published.

Edwards, a New York lawyer, moved to Kanawha County in 1852 and soon began opening coal mines along Paint Creek and the Kanawha River. In 1856, he built the first factory to extract oil from cannel coal, and then branched into railroading and towboats by the end of the Civil War.

While he did much to develop the Kanawha Valley as a coal-mining center, making a personal fortune as an industrialist, it was his role as a naturalist that truly captured his imagination.

Edwards may have enjoyed his role as an entrepreneur, but he was infatuated with butterflies.

A 1988 article in the New Yorker described him as "the grandfather of American lepidopterology," or the study of butterflies, and credited him with scientifically describing or discovering "more North American butterflies than anyone had before, or has since."

An 1886 Rochester, N.Y., newspaper article identified Edwards as "the principal authority on butterflies in the United States, who is said to be to butterflies what Audubon was to birds."

His three-volume work "The Butterflies of North America," was a 30-year labor of love and painstaking research, most of it done at Bellefleur. Collectors from across the continent sent him butterfly eggs and caterpillars to hatch and propagate, allowing him to observe the insects through all their growth stages. His daughter, Anne Edwards Smith, painted the painstakingly authentic color plates of the insects pictured in the guidebooks.

Edwards' love of nature and discovery was whetted during an extended voyage up the Amazon River with his uncle during the 1840s. He wrote about the adventure, as well as the birds, wildlife and insects he encountered, in the 1847 travel book, "Voyage Up the River Amazon."

British naturalists and evolution theory luminaries Alfred Russel Wallace and Henry Walter Bates credited the book with inspiring them to set off on an extended collecting expedition to Brazil in 1848.

Edwards was in London in 1848 to secure funding for a Kanawha Valley mining venture, and had a chance meeting with Wallace and Bates before their departure, allowing Edwards to give the young naturalists a first-hand account of his Amazonian travels. He gave them advice on where to base their expedition and gave them letters of introduction to Brazilian government officials, civic leaders and merchants.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: True WV (10:33am 12-13-2009)
Report Abuse


aggressive ignorance and blinkered superstition...I have a university degree in Science. I do not consider myself ignorant nor superstitious. Still I do not believe in evolution. Name one species that has been changed in any form within the time of recorded history? It makes sense to me that since God created man with some age on him, be it 10 years old or 50 years old, he would have also created Earth to appear to have age on it also. Neither you nor I can prove our position. I still refer to mine as the THEORY, why do the Darwin folk not do the same and continue to refer to their position as the Darwin Theory, not the Darwin laws? Darwin will remain a theory until someone can prove it's points.

Posted By: Elrond (9:18am 12-01-2009)
Report Abuse


Based upon your own definitions of these laws can you answer the following questions?

1.) Where did the space for the universe come from?
2.) Where did matter come from?
3.) Where did the laws of the universe come from - laws such as gravity and intertia?
4.) How did life come from non-living matter?

Evolution is a religion, it takes faith to believe things that cannot be observed it cannot be seen and never has been but is being taught as science? Does not science by its very definition involve observation? Yet we are told that events happened millions and even billions of years ago? Can these things be proven?

Posted By: Elrond (8:39am 12-01-2009)
Report Abuse


Based upon your own definitions of these laws can you answer the following questions?

1.) Where did the space for the universe come from?
2.) Where did matter come from?
3.) Where did the laws of the universe come from - laws such as gravity and intertia?
4.) How did life come from non-living matter?

Evolution is a religion, it takes faith to believe things that cannot be observed it cannot be seen and never has been but is being taught as science? Does not science by its very definition involve observation? Yet we are told that events happened millions and even billions of years ago? Can these things be proven?

Posted By: jadel (4:43pm 11-30-2009)
Report Abuse


Yet more proof that you understand neither thermodynamics nor evolution. The first law says that a change in the energy state of one part of a system must be balanced by a change in another part of the system. Nothing in evolution contradicts that. If you think it does, prove it.

As for entropy and the second law, nothing in the mechanism of evolution indicates a movement toward perfection. That it does is a popular misconception to which you subscribe. Living things seem to violate the second law but do not, for any increase in order--not towards perfection as you erroneously attribute to Darwin-- in a living organism is balanced by the disorder created as that entity consumes food and breaks it down into lower states of order.

It is certainly true that intelligent design cannot be argued. It is based on faith, not reason or evidence. It is essentially irrational. It is not scientific, never can be and has no place whatsoever in a science class.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here