August 15, 2009
Scholars consider violence, pollution, resentment bred by U.S. military bases
Advertiser

More than 190,000 soldiers and 115,000 civilian employees inhabit 900 military bases around the world, according to official government statistics. The real numbers, including top-secret facilities, are significantly larger.

The Pentagon also outsources work on those bases to private military contractors such as DynCorp and Blackwater, now called Xe Services.

Under the new Obama administration, those bases continue to expand, despite rising criticism of U.S. foreign policy at home and around the world.

U.S. military bases do provide jobs to local people across the planet.

But those bases routinely seize land from native peoples and wreak environmental havoc along beautiful coasts, on islands and in ocean waters.

Hundreds of little communities have lost their farmlands. Military jet fuels and poisonous residues from exploded bombs have damaged local children.

And in many places, local people have been imprisoned and tortured by despotic regimes propped up by U.S. political and military support.

Few academics and news reporters write about the extent of these bases, hiding them from public view.

Catherine Lutz, a Brown University professor, does so in her engaging collection of essays, The Bases of Empire: The Global Struggle against U.S. Military Posts.

Local movements challenging U.S. military bases - such as those in Okinawa, Hawaii, Turkey, Puerto Rico, the Philippines and Diego Garcia - are growing, especially among women, sometimes the target of sexual abuses.

Most of our bases are not temporary outposts set up to fight a particular conflict, but part of an enduring U.S. effort to dominate the world.

American ambitions for global domination expanded dramatically in three different eras - in 1898 after the Spanish-American War, in 1945 after World War II and in 2001 after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

"The bases bristle with weapons whose worth is measured in the trillions and whose killing power could wipe out all life on earth several times over," Lutz recently wrote in "The New Statesman."

Major U.S. missile defense systems are located in countries including Greenland, Poland, the Czech Republic, Israel, Korea and Japan.

But since 1990, some U.S. bases have been forced to close down in some areas, including the Philippines, Panama, Saudi Arabia, Vieques and Uzbekistan.  

The Environment and self-determination

Military bases have been used to launch an array of foreign military interventions. They are also designed to protect natural resources, such as oil and natural gas pipelines in the Middle East, Asia, Africa and Latin America.

Joseph Gerson, from the American Friends Service Committee, writes: "Bases bring insecurity: the loss of self-determination, human rights and sovereignty. They degrade the culture, values, health, and environment of host nations - and of the United States."

Environmental damage is an increasingly important issue.

Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: sadsam (5:29am 08-19-2009)
Report Abuse


No reason to worry that bleeding heart there Nyden. Your hero soon will be gutting the military just like Clinton and Carter in the recent past have done. He can take the savings and spend it on his single payer free healthcare system which will make your leftist heart produce a smile from ear to ear.

Posted By: Red Dragon 70 (6:44pm 08-18-2009)
Report Abuse


Thank you, Paul Nyden, for this illuminating insight into the unintended adverse consequences of the U.S. military industrial complex. It would appear to me that the best way to "support the troops" is to humanize them by insisting on responsible behavior in the many communities around the globe where they serve. Our attitude has too long been that misbehavior with and around people who don't look like us is excused as "boys being boys." Consequences to irresponsible actions will serve as a deterrent.

Posted By: Joe6Pk (9:35am 08-18-2009)
Report Abuse


No doubt about it, the Gazette really, really supports our troops, and this kind of tripe from Paul Nyden proves it. EB and gmhoover both have it right.

Posted By: EB (4:16am 08-18-2009)
Report Abuse


Nyden went off the deep end a while back, but this has to rank as one of the most offensive, biased and clueless things he's written.

Please explain Mr. Nyden, if we are so hated, why everybody in Europe screams bloody murder when we talk about leaving them to fend for themselves?

Wow, the Turks opposed the Iraq War? That might have a little to do with them oppressing the Kurds with as much relish as Saddam Hussein. And never mind that we protected them from the Soviets on their border for 50 years.

And the Japanese? By all means, let's leave them to fend for themselves as North Korea builds builds nuclear missiles ten minutes away from them. Good luck with that, oppressed people of Okinawa.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Advertisement - Your ad here
PRECISION TUNE
Precision Tune Auto Care is the fast, convenient and affordable solution to all of your car repai...
Advertisement - Your ad here